List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1. Evaluate tools and techniques for architectural design | 1.1 Apply principles of architectural design within the life cycle of application software 1.2 Develop a process to apply appropriate tools and techniques for architectural design of end-to-end solutions 1.3 Evaluate and select appropriate analysis and selection techniques to develop a partition between discipline technologies and derive discipline-specific requirements |
2. Analyse design options for optimal solutions | 2.1 Critically analyse business options to support architectural design trade-offs for an optimal design solution 2.2 Develop alternative architectural designs traceable to the requirements 2.3 Evaluate a range of architectural solutions and justify selection of the optimum solution |
3. Develop interface requirements for effective solutions across multiple domains | 3.1 Evaluate system element interfaces and sources of complexity for interface management of the system across multiple domains 3.2 Develop a process and appropriate techniques to be adopted for the interface management of system elements for end-to-end architectural solutions 3.3 Produce a control process for system element interfaces of the management system 3.4 Liaise and arbitrate between stakeholders where there are conflicts in the definition of interfaces |
4. Manage end-to-end systems integration | 4.1 Evaluate suitability of system integration, verification and validation plans for end-to-end architectural solutions across multiple domains 4.2 Develop systems integration, verification and validation plans for complex systems to ensure a viable integration process 4.3 Manage system integration plan and diagnose complex faults 4.4 Document fault conditions, report to appropriate person and follow up corrective actions 4.5 Prepare evidence for customer acceptance and certification of the system integration management plan 4.6 Plan and manage a transition to operational activity for the end-to-end solution |
5. Incorporate components of an architecture from a third party | 5.1 Negotiate with vendor for acceptable vendor agreements and agreed roles and responsibilities of each party 5.2 Manage vendor within a clearly defined process for dealing with defects and scope changes 5.3 Plan beyond delivery of specific elements and establish requirements for ongoing maintenance and support from vendor |
6. Manage requirements for the architecture solution | 6.1 Negotiate minimum component costs with vendors and analyse vendor component costs as part of assessment for the appropriateness of vendor’s quote 6.2 Manage vendor selection process to provide high-quality solutions within appropriate costings |
Evidence of the ability to:
evaluate tools and techniques for architectural design
analyse design options for optimal solutions
develop interface requirements for effective solutions across multiple domains
manage end-to-end systems integration
incorporate components of a third party architecture
manage requirements for the architecture solution.
Note: If a specific volume or frequency is not stated, then evidence must be provided at least once.
To complete the unit requirements safely and effectively, the individual must:
provide a detailed summary of architectural design tools
explain interface management
outline management of end-to-end system integration
summarise new end-to-end architecture design solutions
explain solutions for business options across multiple domains
outline system integration solution techniques
summarise system interfaces
explain validation plans
explain importance of vendors' agreements with specific reference to roles and responsibilities of each party
identify and quantify components’ costs.
Gather evidence to demonstrate consistent performance in conditions that are safe and replicate the workplace. Noise levels, production flow, interruptions and time variances should be typical of those experienced in the Telecommunications – Telecommunications Networks Engineering field of work and include access to:
a site where architecture solutions across multiple domains can be managed
simulation software tools currently used in industry
vendor products, specifications, equipment and enterprise policy required for the activity.
Assessors must satisfy NVR/AQTF assessor requirements.